ADNAN OKTAR: The internet was not intended as a place of entertainment. It is the sword of Hazrat Mahdi (pbuh) and the Prophet Jesus (pbuh). The internet is Hazrat Mahdi’s (pbuh) schools. It is the Prophet Jesus’ (pbuh) school and university. Willingly or not, everyone will be enrolled in that university. I mean, everyone who uses the internet will be a student at that university, whether they so wish or not. Because, they are atheist sites on it, opposed to religion. What will an atheist do? One would expect him to look to get as much fun and enjoyment out of this world as he can, won’t he? Or to look for elements of entertainment. But that is not what happens. A miracle takes place. From beginning to end they write supposedly mocking things about that Allah Whom they do not believe in at all, or write things against Him. But if you don’t believe in Allah, why does the idea of Him never leave your mind? Why all this fuss? Why are you trying to escape Him, then? If you don’t believe, then you don’t believe. Why mention the name of Allah at all, instead of engaging with the world and going about your business? But that is not how it is. They talk about Allah day and night. Look at their web sites. They constantly talk about Allah. They supposedly mock religion. It means it is always there subconsciously. That means you believe in Allah, but are in a satanic struggle against religion and are trying to escape from it. You are flittering. The more you flitter, the deeper you get into that belief. They read and criticize the Qur’an. But who do you think you are? You are still wet behind the ears. You cannot understand the Qur’an, so how dare you try and criticize it? The more they read and understand the Qur’an, the more they flitter and resist. One can feel that resistance. But one can also feel they understand it. I mean, one can see they understand it, despite looking at it from satan’s point of view. They are therefore also serving religion. For example, you imagine that a satanist will be opposed to religion, but they actually serve it, willingly or otherwise. They serve it even if they do not wish to. And they serve it if they wish to. It makes no difference. Atheists serve Islam whether they wish to or not. We visit Darwinist sites, for instance, and they criticize my Atlas of Creation, on atheist web sites, Darwinist web sites. I have no idea who they are. But they know me very well, for some reason. I know none of the people who write on those sites, not their names nor who is what to whom. I don’t know them even though they provide their names. This means they are convinced. Why do I not take their writings and put them on my own web site? I put Darwin on my site, but only his dead body. I have demolished Darwinism through him. I have demolished Darwin through Darwin. I demolish Darwinism with Dawkins. I demolish Leninism using statements made by Lenin. I demolish Karl Marx with statements made by Karl Marx. People do not know this. People do not know that we demolish them with their own words. It would be very hard to demolish them in the absence of their own words. It would not be so easy to demolish Darwinism without Darwin’s own words. Not in terms of initial activity. But it could again be done in terms of fossils and proteins. But it might not have been possible to demolish it in terms of those holding or respecting, of those belonging to that school of thought. I say that this is what the person actually thought. For instance, he says there can be no Darwinism in the absence of transitional fossils. He says no transitional fossils have been discovered. In essence, he says that if none are found in the future, Darwinism will collapse and cease to be. And what is happening now? This is the number one evidence demolishing Darwinism. Because he looked for them in his day, but never found them. If they are not found after me, he says, it will all collapse. They looked for them after him, but failed to find them, and it has all collapsed. This is perfect evidence, in other words. I describe the link between Lenin and terror using his own words. And Marx through Marx’s own words. Isn’t that right?

ALTUĞ BERKER:Of course.