ADNAN OKTAR: For instance, there are people who talk about the faith in an indirect way. They try to tellstealthily but his way of telling is very weak. This has no place in faith. That is an advantage in faithlessness, I mean such a method is an advantage in faithlessness. But this is not an advantage in faith. In faith, faith needs to be told directly. For instance, there are weak-spirited Muslim writers who are very timid. They tell and tell, in the end they say, "I think that there may be a Creator but I can say this much only." Brother, if you are that weak-spirited then why do you come out in the first place? You only do harm by saying this in such a weak manner. For instance, there are anti-evolutionist movements in Europe, "the intelligent design" and all. We ask them, "Who did this?" They say, "We don't know, a sort of intelligence." Brother, if you don't have the strength to say Allah, if you are that powerless then what are you talking about? I have had an interview the other day with these people and I crushed them over. They have a very weak manner of speech. But for example, in atheist Darwinist materialist movement, since people are tentative and the majority of the people are in constant hesitation and they can't decide on the existence of Allah. It is just 50-50. Such articles may bring those hesitations up to 51 and pull its weight on the side of faithlessness..