ADNAN OKTAR: Here is one more farcical remark insha'Allah. Pay attention, ready? He says: "The most significant evidence, indicated by Bediuzzaman revealing that Hazrat Mahdi (pbuh) is a collective personality is that he particularly says while mentioning Hazrat Mahdi three times" -as you know Bediuzzaman constantly uses the words "that person", "that individual", "Mahdi"- So this one says "since he says this numerous times, what does this mean? That means there are a lot of individuals," he says.  For instance, we constantly mention about Mr. Erbakan here; we use the words "that person", "this person" while we are talking about him. Or, sometimes we talk about you, and we say "Tarkan","Tarkan" to refer you, or we say "this person" or "that person" to refer you.  Since we have been saying that numerous times, that means you are not an individual, that is you are not a person. That means you are a collective personality, Tarkan. What do you say to that?  Farcical, truly farcical, masha'Allah!

My brother, why do they ever get involved with this desolation? How could people with a university degree say that? When a person is referred as  "that person", "that individual, that is the Mahdi" or "the individual who will come in the End Times", or "that known person", or "that extraordinary individual", or "that person" for 60 times or 70 times; if that is referred to constantly; it is very irrational to claim a logic stating that if these words are constantly emphasized -collecting all of these will refer to many people; repeating the word  "person" for many times means it is a collective personality; and thus Mahdi is not an individual.

My brother, let Turkey hear this logic. That is the situation we have at hand. This is pathetic, truly miserable; and there are people who actually believe in this. As you see, someone has written this logic down. What website is this?

TARKAN YAVAS:The name of the website is: Sorularla Risale (Risale-i Nur Collection through Question)

ADNAN OKTAR:Risale through questions. How farcical! Those who get curious about it can visit it. In order to enable them understand perfectly, Beduizzaman constantly repeats, while referring to Mahdi he says: "that person", "the one", "the mentioned person" "he" for many times. The one says; "Since the words "that person", "this individual" is repeated numerous times, it is understood that it constitutes a group, and this is not for an individual but for a collective personality, therefore Hazrat Mahdi (pbuh) is not a person. Thank you." Just visit it, and see. What a farcical remark! Now, I have found a one more new model. Do you see what refraining from Hazrat Mahdi (pbuh) can turn people into? Is Hazrat Mahdi (pbuh) a person that anyone needs to refrain? He is a person who will bring beauty, wealth and plentitude to the world. Look at this miserable logic.